fix: flatten nested case blocks with with chains (CSM-020)

Replace deeply nested case expressions with flat with chains in
import_definitions, publishing, and templates modules. Also replaced
Repo.update!() with Repo.update() in the publishing update_job handler.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-05-10 12:36:42 +02:00
parent b6f9cf58e1
commit 7c00279b9d
5 changed files with 171 additions and 100 deletions

View File

@@ -340,18 +340,13 @@
---
### CSM-020 — Deeply Nested `case` Instead of `with`
- **Files:** `lib/bds/import_definitions.ex:54-66`, `lib/bds/publishing.ex:47-58`, `lib/bds/templates.ex:86-163`
- **Fix:** Flatten with `with`:
```elixir
with {:ok, record} <- Repo.get(Model, id),
{:ok, updated} <- Repo.update(changeset) do
{:ok, updated}
else
nil -> {:error, :not_found}
{:error, changeset} -> {:error, changeset}
end
```
### ~~CSM-020 — Deeply Nested `case` Instead of `with`~~ ✅ FIXED
- **Fixed:** 2026-05-10
- **What was done:**
- **`lib/bds/import_definitions.ex`** — `delete_definition/1`: Replaced nested `case` piped into another `case` with a flat `with` chain: `Repo.get``Repo.delete``{:ok, :deleted}`, with `else` clauses for `nil` and `{:error, _}`.
- **`lib/bds/publishing.ex`** — `handle_call({:update_job, ...})`: Replaced `case Repo.get` with `with %PublishJob{} = job <- Repo.get(...)`. Also replaced `Repo.update!()` with `Repo.update()` to avoid crashes on changeset errors.
- **`lib/bds/templates.ex`** — `update_template/2`: Replaced outer `case Repo.get` with `with` + extracted `do_update_template/2` private function. Collapsed three levels of nested `case` (Repo.get → transaction_result → sync_side_effects) into a single flat `with` chain.
- Added 7 tests in `test/bds/csm020_nested_case_test.exs`: delete_definition success and not-found, update_template success and not-found, source-level assertions that all three files use `with` instead of nested `case`.
---